The closest I ever came to a religious experience was listening to Ivan Illich. it or not). I devoured both Medical Nemesis and Limits to Medicine,† and now . In this book, Ivan Illich offers a harsh critique of health care as provided in western industrialized societies during the s. However, he did. This is the opening statement and basic contention of Ivan Illich’s searing social critique. In Limits to Medicine Ivan Illich has enlarged on this theme of disabling.

Author: Fejar Sarn
Country: Reunion
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 21 February 2016
Pages: 69
PDF File Size: 18.76 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.97 Mb
ISBN: 500-4-28777-196-5
Downloads: 24845
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nigal

Though the book was written mediclne the 70s so a lot of the research is dated, much of the book still rings true – its the same shit just with more forward momentum.

Suggesting that mental health problems are not best viewed as a disease is not to say that they are not sometimes deeply problematic- for those who suffer them and for others. The medical system has failed, is economically unsustainable, limitts it mostly serves to promote sickness. These companies will fail because of pharmacogentics and in particular the emerging Cytochrome P test. Medicine has created a myth that we can heal everything, given enough time and money.

Limits to Medicine : Ivan Illich :

Sep 16, Chrisl rated it really liked it Shelves: If I had read all these notes I wou My office at Loyola sponsored Illich to speak to our pre-med medicibe on which occasion I was introduced to him. The harmful way we remove autonomy of healing – only the expert can be trusted to facilitate read: It consists not only of making individuals but whole populations survive on inhumanly low levels of personal health.


After all, it involves allowing someone else to interfere with your body, your own personal, physical self. I recall Susan Sontag criticised him for personal hypocrisy, having accepted advanced medicine facing cancer, but, well, what would you do!?

In this setting we function a million times more efficiently because we have natural capabilities in our brain for sensing illness and problems in our lives. I don’t agree with some of his suggested solutions, such as his claim that our only alternative is to create conditions in society for equitable autonomy.

Healthy people need minimal bureaucratic interference to mate, give birth, share the human condition, and die. Written init foresaw all the major problems in health-care, but also its manifestations in society. Refresh and try again. He felt that more expensive and specialised medicine was more likely to be harmful and less effective, and that important aspects of the life experience such as birth, mating, suffering, aging and dying were being medicalized. Illich is the counterbalance we need if we’re to remember what words mean, what we want to be working towards, the kind of world we’d like to live in, and what makes up a good life.

Here are some of the issues that I think I understood.

As much as this would be a nice thing, I don’t see it as realistic in the light of human nature that tends to prefer hierarchies to equity. Despite its impassioned arguments, Limits to Medicine is an incredibly scholarly book, drawing extensively on anthropology and cross-cultural literature, as well as scholarship on the epistemology of sickness and the linguistics of suffering among many other areas.

More is not better, but harmful in this case.

You can agree or disagree with the guy, but he made some great quotes. Before the social movements and transformations produced standardized health care, people of various cultures coped and adjusted in their own ways to the suffering they experienced. The other big negative about the book is its sheer density.

  EECS 5R5V105 PDF

Limits to Medicine: Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health by Ivan Illich

If you can lllich past the plethora of footnotes on each page, some taking up more space than the actual text, you might have a readable treatise. Submitting yourself to medicine now requires the wholesale signing away of your bodily integrity. What could anyone object to about making sick people better?

That is why I am doing the Radar study, to try and produce evidence on this.

Limits to Medicine: Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health

Body Consciousness Seymour Fisher. This book is truly prophetical and shattering. Jun 15, Sophie rated it it was ok Shelves: Much of the book is taken up with an explanation of mdicine three main forms of iatrogenesis harm from medicine.

This is like being caught up in the medico-legal vicious cycle of impairment evaluation and compensation claims: I wasn’t much impressed by Medical Nemesis, finding its prose rather difficult and its reliance on footnotes a very substantial proportion of the text too great.

The Best Ilpich of Jun 04, Arys Aditya rated it really liked it. Ot author has ser If you can get past the plethora of footnotes on each page, some taking up more space than the actual text, you might have a readable treatise.